Arrange the jumbled words or phrases to make a meaningful sentence or a part of the sentence.
The move to subsidise sugar exports, without A. areas unsuited for the crop, will tide B. any move to discourage cane cultivation in C. only to further misallocate resources D. over an immediate political problem. A. BADC B. CADB C. BDAC D. ACDB
Correct answer: A. BADC
The sentence is:
The move to subsidise sugar exports, without any move to discourage cane cultivation in areas unsuited for the crop, will tide over an immediate political problem only to further misallocate resources.
Explanation:
Part B: “any move to discourage cane cultivation in”
This follows the opening clause “The move to subsidise sugar exports, without” and introduces what is missing.
Part A: “areas unsuited for the crop, will tide”
This completes the phrase “cultivation in areas unsuited for the crop” and introduces the verb phrase.
Part D: “over an immediate political problem.”
This continues the verb phrase “will tide over” and specifies the immediate issue.
Part C: “only to further misallocate resources”
This concludes the sentence by explaining the negative consequence.
Additional Notes:
• The sequence BADC flows logically: missing action → affected area → immediate solution → long-term consequence.
• Other options either break the logical flow or place parts in an unnatural order.
Arrange the jumbled words or phrases to make a meaningful sentence or a part of the sentence. As lightning accompanies thunder, P : was mingled with Q : so in my character R : the mutterings of my wrath S : a flash of humour A. PRSQ B. QPRS C. QRPS D. QSPR
Correct answer: D. QSPR
The sentence is:
As lightning accompanies thunder, so in my character a flash of humour was mingled with the mutterings of my wrath.
Explanation:
Part Q: “so in my character”
This follows the opening clause “As lightning accompanies thunder,” and introduces the comparison.
Part S: “a flash of humour”
This follows “so in my character” and introduces the first element of the comparison.
Part P: “was mingled with”
This connects the two elements, stating that humour was mixed with something.
Part R: “the mutterings of my wrath”
This completes the sentence by specifying what the humour was mingled with.
Additional Notes:
• The sequence QSPR flows logically: comparison → first element → connection → second element.
• Other options either break the logical flow or place parts in an unnatural order.
Arrange the jumbled words or phrases to make a meaningful sentence or a part of the sentence. The exhibition committee P : attractive and useful Q : to make the exhibition R : making efforts S : has been A. QPRS B. QPSR C. SRPQ D. SRQP
Correct answer: D. SRQP
The sentence is:
The exhibition committee has been making efforts to make the exhibition attractive and useful.
Explanation:
Part S: “has been”
This follows the subject “The exhibition committee” and provides the auxiliary verb.
Part R: “making efforts”
This follows “has been” and completes the verb phrase.
Part Q: “to make the exhibition”
This explains the purpose of the efforts.
Part P: “attractive and useful”
This describes what the exhibition should be like.
Additional Notes:
• The sequence SRQP flows logically: auxiliary verb → action → purpose → description.
• Other options either break the logical flow or place parts in an unnatural order.
Arrange the jumbled words or phrases to make a meaningful sentence or a part of the sentence. P : took place Q : when militants opened fire on BSF men R : the encounter lasting over two hours S : in the town around 8.30 a.m. A. QPRS B. QSRP C. RPQS D. RPSQ
Correct answer: C. RPQS
The sentence is:
The encounter lasting over two hours took place when militants opened fire on BSF men in the town around 8.30 a.m.
Explanation:
Part R: “the encounter lasting over two hours”
This introduces the subject of the sentence.
Part P: “took place”
This provides the main verb phrase, stating what happened.
Part Q: “when militants opened fire on BSF men”
This introduces the time and condition of the encounter.
Part S: “in the town around 8.30 a.m.”
This adds the location and time details.
Additional Notes:
• The sequence RPQS flows logically: subject → action → cause → details.
• Other options either break the logical flow or place parts in an unnatural order.
Arrange the jumbled words or phrases to make a meaningful sentence or a part of the sentence. 1 : If the parachutes had failed to open P : the whole of his couch would Q : he could have pulled a liver to provide an emergency ejection R : and special parachutes would have unfolded S : then have been fired from the cabin 6 : to bring him down. A. PSRQ B. QPSR C. RSQP D. SQPR
Correct answer: B. QPSR
Explanation:
Part Q: “he could have pulled a lever to provide an emergency ejection”
Main Action:
The sentence starts with “he could have pulled a lever to provide an emergency ejection,” explaining the action the person could take in the event of a parachute failure.
Rule: We begin with the main action or potential action in the situation described.
Part P: “the whole of his couch would”
Subject Clarification:
Next, we explain what would happen if the parachutes failed — “the whole of his couch would”.
Rule: After describing the action, we clarify the impact or outcome of the action.
Part S: “then have been fired from the cabin”
Outcome:
Then we describe the consequence of pulling the lever — “then have been fired from the cabin.”
Rule: After describing the potential outcome, we explain what would happen next.
Part R: “and special parachutes would have unfolded”
Additional Information:
Finally, we provide additional information on what else would happen — “and special parachutes would have unfolded” as part of the emergency procedure.
Rule: After completing the main consequence, we provide further details to clarify the situation.
Additional Notes:
• The sequence QPSR logically sets up the action, the consequences, and the emergency measures in case of parachute failure.
• The other options do not maintain the correct flow of ideas.
Arrange the jumbled words or phrases to make a meaningful sentence or a part of the sentence. During hibernation P : they have lost a good deal of weight Q : of course the animals consume R : and when they awake again S : the fats accumulated in the summer A. PQRS B. QSRP C. RQSP D. SQPR
Correct answer: B. QSRP
The sentence is:
During hibernation, of course the animals consume the fats accumulated in the summer and when they awake again they have lost a good deal of weight.
Explanation:
Part Q: “of course the animals consume”
This follows the opening clause “During hibernation” and introduces the subject and action.
Part S: “the fats accumulated in the summer”
This specifies what the animals consume.
Part R: “and when they awake again”
This introduces the next part of the process, describing what happens after hibernation.
Part P: “they have lost a good deal of weight”
This concludes the sentence by stating the result of consuming the fats during hibernation.
Additional Notes:
• The sequence QSRP flows logically: action → object → time clause → result.
• Other options either break the logical flow or place parts in an unnatural order.
Arrange the jumbled words or phrases to make a meaningful sentence or a part of the sentence. 1 : Almost every country in the world P : that it is of the chosen people Q : it has some special dispensation from Providence R : and that others are somewhat S : believes that 6 : inferior creatures A. RPQS B. RQPS C. SQPR D. SQRP
Correct answer: C. SQPR
The sentence is:
Almost every country in the world believes that it has some special dispensation from Providence and that others are somewhat inferior creatures.
Explanation:
Part S: “believes that”
This follows the opening clause “Almost every country in the world” and introduces the belief.
Part Q: “it has some special dispensation from Providence”
This is the first part of the belief.
Part P: “that it is of the chosen people”
This continues the belief, forming a parallel structure.
Part R: “and that others are somewhat”
This introduces the comparative contrast.
Additional Notes:
• The sequence SQPR flows logically: belief → first part → second part → contrast.
• Other options either break the logical flow or place parts in an unnatural order.
Arrange the jumbled words or phrases to make a meaningful sentence or a part of the sentence. 1 : Above all, P : in the present age of light reading, Q : it is well if something heavier is cast now and then R : of reading hastily and thoughtlessly, S : that is, 6 : into the mkdst of the reading public. A. PQRS B. PRQS C. PSRQ D. QSRP
Correct answer: B. PRQS
Explanation:
Part P: “in the present age of light reading,”
Context Introduction:
The sentence begins with “in the present age of light reading,” which sets the context by referring to the current trend of light reading.
Rule: Context and time-related phrases typically come at the beginning of a sentence to set the stage for the rest of the information.
Part R: “of reading hastily and thoughtlessly,”
Clarification of the Context:
Next, we describe the nature of light reading — “of reading hastily and thoughtlessly.”
Rule: After establishing the context, we explain the characteristics of the activity being discussed.
Part Q: “it is well if something heavier is cast now and then”
Main Point:
Then, we introduce the main point of the sentence, which is that something more substantial or thought-provoking should occasionally be introduced.
Rule: After providing the context and characteristics, we state what should be done or recommended.
Part S: “into the midst of the reading public.”
Final Detail/Conclusion:
Finally, we complete the thought with “into the midst of the reading public.” This part explains where the “heavier” reading should be introduced.
Rule: The final part usually gives the conclusion or additional information about the subject.
Additional Notes:
• The sequence PRQS presents a clear, logical flow: first setting the context, explaining the trend, stating what should be done, and concluding with where it should happen.
• The other options do not follow this logical progression.
Arrange the jumbled words or phrases to make a meaningful sentence or a part of the sentence. We can think of P : often confused in the public mind Q : which suggest the need for R : two factors S : an international language A. PRQS B. RPQS C. RQSP D. SQRP
Correct answer: B. RPQS
Explanation:
Part R: “two factors”
Introduction of Subject:
The sentence begins with “two factors,” introducing the main topic of discussion, which are the two factors.
Rule: The subject is typically introduced first to set the stage for the rest of the sentence.
Part P: “often confused in the public mind”
Clarification:
Next, we describe how the two factors are perceived — “often confused in the public mind.”
Rule: After introducing the subject, we provide further explanation or details about how it is perceived.
Part Q: “which suggest the need for”
Main Point:
Then, we present the point that the two factors are suggesting — “which suggest the need for.”
Rule: After explaining the confusion, we present the outcome or implication of the factors.
Part S: “an international language”
Conclusion/Final Detail:
Finally, we explain what the factors are suggesting the need for — “an international language.”
Rule: The final part concludes the thought by specifying what is needed.
Additional Notes:
• The sequence RPQS logically follows: introducing the two factors, explaining their confusion, stating the suggestion they imply, and concluding with the need for an international language.
• The other options do not maintain a clear or grammatically correct flow.
Arrange the jumbled words or phrases to make a meaningful sentence or a part of the sentence. The Buddha P : who had Q : set views R : was opposed to all those S : or closed system of thought A. PQRS B. PQSR C. RPQS D. SRPQ
Correct answer: C. RPQS
The sentence is:
The Buddha was opposed to all those who had set views or closed system of thought.
Explanation:
Part R: “was opposed to all those”
This follows the subject “The Buddha” and introduces the object of his opposition.
Part P: “who had”
This begins a relative clause describing “those.”
Part Q: “set views”
This provides the first part of what “those” had.
Part S: “or closed system of thought”
This completes the relative clause by adding the second thing “those” had.
Additional Notes:
• The sequence RPQS flows logically: subject → opposition → description → completion.
• Other options either break the logical flow or place parts in an unnatural order.
ordering of words in a sentence mcq
We hope that this Ordering of Words MCQ Objective Question with Answer page that Rankers Hub provides was helpful in your practice. Ordering of Words Objective Questions with Answers is specially designed for students who are preparing for various competitive exams like bank, SSC, CAPF, CLAT, and Defence exams like CDS and AFCAT. We have tried to provide Ordering of Words of MCQ Questions and answers with easy and logical explanations for Ordering of Words MCQ so that aspirants can master the topic and prepare for their respective exams. Visit the Rankers Hub website regularly and practice MCQ Questions Answers MCQ for your best preparation.
Download the Rankers Hub App from the Google Play Store and start your preparation. Rankers Hub is the best site for mock tests and video courses. The salient features of the courses are we cover all important questions as per the latest pattern, eBooks, previous year’s papers, and we also provide free mock tests to start your preparation.
